diff --git a/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Pricing.-.md b/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Pricing.-.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..47de037
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Flat-Rate vs Per-Solve CAPTCHA Pricing.-.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+One common misstep is simply treating every solver as interchangeable. Match the solver to your CAPTCHA mix, the scale, and your cost ceiling - CapSkip spans image CAPTCHAs, reCAPTCHA and Turnstile at a flat rate, which fits most real projects.
+
+Scaling your automation operation becomes much easier when cost no longer scale alongside throughput. Under flat-rate pricing and uncapped solves, you can push concurrent jobs and skip any surprise invoice.
+
+At its core, a CAPTCHA solver reads a challenge and returns the solution a site is looking for, so an hands-off tool can continue. The difference with CapSkip is everything happens locally - nothing leaves your hardware, and there are no per-solve charges. That combination of privacy and predictable cost is hard to beat for serious workloads.
+
+The GeeTest slider challenges are famously awkward for bots, so having a tool that supports them is a real plus. CapSkip solves GeeTest locally, so scripts that depend on these targets keep running when the challenge appears.
+
+Anyone moving from 2Captcha usually brace for a painful switch. In practice, because CapSkip emulates the same request format, the change is largely a matter of the endpoint and keeping everything else the same.
+
+Test automation engineers run into CAPTCHAs as well, particularly when testing live sites that mirror production. Instead of skipping these tests, they can let CapSkip handle the challenge so coverage remains intact.
+
+A migration checklist makes the move painless: point the API URL at CapSkip, confirm some live solves, then flip the main jobs. Since the API mirrors major services, the bulk of the work is essentially done.
+
+Data control is a genuine issue when every challenge gets shipped to a remote service. With CapSkip, nothing departs your hardware, so sensitive projects remain on your own systems. If you handle regulated work, that can be the clincher.
+
+One common mistake is simply treating any solver as if interchangeable. Line up the tool to your challenge mix, your volume, and your budget - CapSkip covers the common types at a flat rate, which suits most real workloads.
+
+QA teams run into CAPTCHAs as well, particularly when testing staging sites that mirror production. Instead of skipping these tests, they can have CapSkip clear the challenge so the suite stays complete.
+
+The developer API is designed to emulate the request format of major CAPTCHA-solving services. What this means, scripts and scripts that currently target those services are able to switch to CapSkip needing minimal changes and zero new code.
+
+A Python codebase developers get a simple path with CapSkip, since it emulates the request format of popular solving services. Often, this means pointing current code at CapSkip takes little effort - no rewrite.
+
+Turnstile is now a frequent gatekeeper on pages that want to deter bots without the usual image puzzles. CapSkip clears Turnstile locally in a few seconds, handling the challenge and managed variants. If you run automation that run into Turnstile, that removes a major roadblock.
+
+Teams migrating from 2Captcha usually expect a painful migration. In reality, since CapSkip emulates the familiar API, the move comes down to mostly a matter of endpoints and keeping everything else the same.
+
+Moving from CapSolver tends to be equally smooth: aim the scripts at CapSkip, keep the flow, and trade per-solve billing for one predictable price. Any switch is done in a short session, rather than days.
+
+Data collection is among the top reasons teams adopt a [CAPTCHA solver](https://lidmilink.ru/nellstatton690). One stalled page will stall an entire job, so clearing challenges automatically lets throughput steady. CapSkip slots into these pipelines cleanly.
+
+A major advantages of processing locally comes down to price. Traditional services charge for each solve, so your bill rise as volume increases. CapSkip goes with flat-rate pricing and unlimited solves, so you can scale does not mean watching the meter.
+
+Within reason, CAPTCHA solving supports valid use cases such as QA, accessibility, and authorized data collection. It is wise honoring a target's terms and applicable law; used that way, a solver is simply a productivity tool.
+
+The developer API is designed to emulate the request format of the major CAPTCHA-solving services. What this means, tools and scripts that currently call those services are able to switch to CapSkip with minimal changes and zero coding.
+
+Proxies are essential for real scraping, and CapSkip works with them out of the box. Teams can send traffic the way your setup needs while still solving CAPTCHAs locally, which keeps behavior natural across runs.
+
+The developer API was built to emulate the request format of major CAPTCHA-solving services. What this means, scripts and tools that already call those services are able to point at CapSkip needing little [learn More](https://Gogs.xn--feld-4Qa.de/kayleereber759/benny1994/wiki/Choosing+a+VPS+for+Guarded+Scraping) than a URL change and no new code.
+
+Classic image and text CAPTCHAs are still extremely common, from sign-up pages to registration screens. CapSkip recognizes a huge range of image CAPTCHA variants on your own hardware, typically in about a tenth of a second. This throughput matters when you handle large volumes.
\ No newline at end of file